Skip to content
Con la tuya, contribuyenteEvery peso the Uruguayan state spends, traceable.
Sign in
Scope2,184,330 records searchedPeriod2009 → 2026Official Gazette · environmental file · OCDS corpus

Own investigation · public records

The data center that is not in state procurement

We searched for the largest construction under way in Canelones across 2.18 million public procurement records. It is not there: not the company, not the park, not the road. The trail is elsewhere, and it is public.

Resolution 65/024Project "Teros"Plots 47,827-47,832Zero in procurement

Records of the data center in the procurement corpus

0

out of 2,184,330 awards published since 2002

US$ 850 M
announced investment
per the press; not in the official file
32.5 ha
of land
plots 47,763 and 47,827 to 47,832
50
people in operation
per the project's own official summary
0
procurement records
neither as supplier nor as buyer

The search

What we looked for, and why it is not there

A data center this size moves civil works, power, water, roads and permits. If the State had bought any of it, it would be in the procurement record. We searched by the company named in the environmental file — Eleanor Applications S.R.L., not "Google" — by the park's name, by the road and kilometre, and by tenders mentioning a data center at that location.

There is nothing. Zero as supplier, zero as buyer, zero tenders. And the zero is correct: this is not public works. It is a private investment inside a free zone, so the State does not pay for it. It does something else: it exempts it from taxes, authorises the land use, approves the environmental impact and sells it electricity.

The obvious next question is infrastructure: someone has to bring the electricity. We searched for that too. The power utility does have substation awards in the period — the largest, 141 million pesos to Montelecnor in January 2026 — but none mentions Ciudad de la Costa, Nicolich, Pando or Route 101, so we cannot attribute any of them to the project. And the official summary explains it: the electrical substation is built by the project, not by the State.

So this investigation is not looking for a purchase. It looks for the public decisions that made it possible, all of them published and almost never read together.

What we searchedRecords
Eleanor Applications S.R.L. as supplier or buyer0
"Parque de las Ciencias" in suppliers, buyers or line items0
"Ruta 101" or "Ciudad de la Costa" in items and tenders0
Tenders mentioning a data center at that location0
Power-utility works (substations, lines) mentioning that area0

The trail that does exist

Fifteen years of decisions, in the Official Gazette

Every link in this chain is a public document. We read the first four directly; the last is press and is labelled as such.

  1. The Executive authorises Parque de las Ciencias S.A. to run a private free zone under Law 15,921, on plot 46,779 in Canelones.

  2. First expansion: the free zone grows from 51 hectares 3,469 metres to 80 hectares 5,841 metres, adding eight plots merged into 47,763. This is the land where the project was announced.

  3. The environmental impact study for project "Teros" is filed with the Ministry of Environment. The applicant is Eleanor Applications S.R.L.; the name "Google" does not appear on the cover.

  4. Resolution 65/024 of the Ministry of Economy: the free zone expands to 83 hectares 6,136 metres 88 decimetres with six new plots, 47,827 through 47,832. The text states that the owner of those plots is Eleanor Applications S.R.L. and gives it 180 days to register the easement required by article 13 of the free-zone law. These are exactly the plots where the data center goes.

  5. The Ministry of Environment signs Ministerial Resolution 644-2024 granting prior environmental authorisation, with seven conditions — including that the authorisation lapses if works do not start within two years.

  6. Press

    The foundation stone is laid. The announced investment is over 850 million dollars.

What the file says

And what the citizens' summary does not

The IAR summary is the document the file publishes so anyone can understand the project without reading 104 pages. The concrete facts are there: the site is 32.5 hectares; stage one takes 26 months of works and there are 32 more months to the last stage; between 300 and 400 people will work on it, peaking at 800; and in operation, fifty. Also that the project builds its own electrical substation and will have diesel generators for outages.

What that summary does not carry are the two figures the project was argued over: how much water and how much energy it consumes. The first has a known explanation — the original project foresaw 7,600 cubic metres of drinking water a day, it was reformulated after the 2023 drought and cooling is now air-based. The second does not: the electricity demand the press attributes to a technical report in the file, 560 gigawatt-hours a year and about 48 megawatts, does not appear in the summary the State publishes to explain the project.

We are not saying it is hidden: it may well be in the 104 pages of the full report, whose PDF has broken encoding and which we could not read. We are saying the document written for citizens to understand the project omits the number that defines its impact.

The fine print

The seven conditions of the authorisation

The environmental authorisation was not a plain permit. The press that read the resolution detailed five of the seven conditions and summarised the other two. We list them as published, flagging which ones were left without detail.

  1. A two-year deadline: the authorisation lapses if works do not start within it.
  2. A ban on using the Gonzalo "Gonchi" Rodríguez road during construction.
  3. Updating the Environmental Management Plan with programmes for construction waste, traffic management, community relations and effluent management.
  4. Executing the works strictly as submitted and approved, without departing from the resolution.
  5. Filing monitoring analyses, the executive project and a schedule within 45 days of the start of works.
  6. Making information available to the National Environmental Quality Directorate (no further detail in the report).
  7. Drawing up mitigation plans for the environmental risks identified (no further detail in the report).

We could not check this list against the text of the resolution: the PDF the Ministry publishes is scanned and has no readable text layer. That is why it is attributed to the news report and not to the document.

The contrast

What the State does pay to host its own servers

While the country's largest data center is built tax-free, the State pays someone else to keep its own data. The corpus holds 16 awards for data-center hosting, worth 102.5 million pesos, from eleven public bodies: the Presidency, the Prosecutor General, the tax office, the casinos directorate, the social development ministry, the water utility, the power utility, the technological university, the Colonia city government.

Almost all of it is billed by ANTEL — 75.8 million — a state-owned company with its own data center, the Ing. José Luis Massera, in the Pando Technological Industrial Park: same department and same Route 101 as Google's, a few kilometres away. Across all its lines, ANTEL billed the State 4,614 million pesos in 1,138 contracts with 99 public bodies.

Comparing the two buildings sets the scale. The State's was built for about 50 million dollars, has 12,000 square metres and 12 megawatts. Google's is announced at over 850 million and the press attributes to it a demand of about 48 megawatts: four times the power of the country's sovereign data center, in private hands and tax-free.

There is nothing irregular in that: it is the State buying itself a service it needs. What the contrast shows is where each one stands on the same ground: one pays to host its data, the other settles in tax-exempt to host the world's.

16 · 11 · 2025-05-07 → 2026-08-06

$ 103 M

Method

What we could not verify

  • The three contracts that, according to Búsqueda, the power utility signed with Google for electricity supply: they are sales rather than state purchases, so they are not in this record, and the article sits behind a paywall.
  • The Pulitzer Center investigation into how the project was approved: its site returned a 403 error to our request.
  • The full text of Resolution 644-2024 and of the Environmental Summary Report: both PDFs are scanned or broken. The seven conditions we cite come from the press that did read them.
Do you know something about this?

Tell it where you can be protected

We publish what is in the open data. What isn't — the file, the message, what was said in the meeting — goes to Uruguay Leaks, the anonymous inbox run by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. The message is written for you: copy it, add what you know and paste it into their form.

Do not send it from your work computer or work email. Uruguay Leaks protects the submission, not the machine you send it from.

Uruguay Leaks is a project by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. We are not affiliated with them and receive no copy of what you send.

How to read this investigation

This is an analysis of public procurement data, which is public record. It documents verifiable facts — amounts, dates, suppliers, procurement method — and flags patterns worth scrutiny, keeping proven facts apart from open questions.

An exception purchase, a high price or supplier concentration is not, on its own, proof of wrongdoing. Many contracts may have valid administrative justification. The goal is to enable citizen oversight, not to issue a verdict.

Companies and people are named only as state suppliers, as they appear in the official system. Anyone named may add their response or correct a figure, and it will be incorporated.