Skip to content
Con la tuya, contribuyenteEvery peso the Uruguayan state spends, traceable.
Sign in
FileGender and diversityWhole state · OCDS open data

Investigation · Series

How much Uruguay spends on gender and diversity policy

The procurement feed has no "gender policy" label: it has to be rebuilt from the text each civil servant typed. Doing so surfaces three things the public debate rarely mentions: the measurable spend is small, it is concentrated in a single victim-support network, and eight in ten contracts in the field carry no amount at all.

Refreshed every MondayMethod publishedEvery contract linked to its record

The starting point

Why you cannot just look this up

State procurement publishes what was bought, from whom and for how much — but not which policy it served. There is no "policy area" field, no buying body called Inmujeres (the National Women's Institute buys through the MIDES executing unit), and no catalogue heading that groups the subject. All that is left is the free text a civil servant typed when loading the call.

So it is rebuilt from there, with a published, auditable term list. Rebuilding from text has concrete traps that must be killed before adding up a single peso: in Uruguayan procurement Spanish "género" also means CLOTH, "trans" hides inside "transporte" and "transferencia", the "Plan de Equidad" was an unrelated MIDES cash transfer, and "diversidad" on its own drags in the National Biodiversity Directorate.

Right now

What is out to tender this week

No open calls on the topic at the moment.

The method

How it was built, and what was thrown out

Two stages. First rules: a term list with context guards — the thing that stops "esterilla de género" or "metres of género for curtains" entering as public policy. Then a model reads the whole contract and decides whether it really belongs and in which category. Only what survives both stages counts.

The discards are kept and published, because a topic rebuilt from text is only auditable if you can see what was left out. Among the false positives the classifier removed: a purchase of worms "(GENERO EISENIA FOETIDA)", an air conditioner for a section called "Género" inside an HR directorate, and cloth bags.

Do you know something about this?

Tell it where you can be protected

We publish what is in the open data. What isn't — the file, the message, what was said in the meeting — goes to Uruguay Leaks, the anonymous inbox run by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. The message is written for you: copy it, add what you know and paste it into their form.

Do not send it from your work computer or work email. Uruguay Leaks protects the submission, not the machine you send it from.

Uruguay Leaks is a project by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. We are not affiliated with them and receive no copy of what you send.

How to read this investigation

Every figure comes from State-procurement open data (OCDS) and is recomputed every Monday. The total is a floor: most contracts in the topic carry no amount in the feed.

The page does not say whether this spending is good or bad, nor whether the policies work. Procurement data holds purchases, not policy outcomes.

The governing party is shown as electoral context for the year of each contract. It does not imply a party decided, caused or executed the purchase.

The topic classification uses a language model in its second stage. It can be wrong; that is why each contract keeps the reason for its classification and the discard list is public.