Skip to content
Con la tuya, contribuyenteEvery peso the Uruguayan state spends, traceable.
Sign in
FileIntendencia de MontevideoBuyer 98-1Period2012–2025Compras Estatales (OCDS) · verified file by file

Investigation · Departmental spending

Montevideo in the red: what the city government bought while its deficit multiplied eightfold

In 2024 the Intendencia de Montevideo posted its biggest deficit in a decade — USD 82.6 million, eight times the year before. Meanwhile it kept paying for advertising, shows, catering and merchandising. Here is the discretionary spend, contract by contract.

2024 deficit: USD 82.6 MPurchases 2012–2025Every contract linked to its file
$ 48,59 mil M
Trackable purchases
Buyer 98-1 · 2012–2025 · plausibility-capped
$ 3,64 mil M
2024 deficit
USD 82.6 M · biggest in 10 years
$ 15.631
Median contract
×8
Times the 2023 deficit

The context

A deficit that multiplied eightfold

The 2024 accounts left the Intendencia de Montevideo with a deficit of $3,640 million pesos (USD 82.6 million per El Observador; USD 90.4 million per Ámbito), eight times that of 2023 and the largest in a decade. The accumulated deficit is around USD 497 million.

The city blames falling central-government transfers and the end of a local levy. Under Mario Bergara (2025) it announced a ~70% cut, to about USD 18 million, while seeking new loans. This investigation asks the other side: with that red ink on the table, what discretionary spending carried on?

The discretionary part

Advertising, shows, catering, furniture

These are the lines a body in deficit tends to cut first. They are not illegal or necessarily unjustified — some is the city’s cultural mandate — but they are elastic: they can be postponed. This is what the city spent on each (priced purchases, 2012–2025).

Discretionary spend by category

Click a bar to see those contracts

The discretionary part

Consultancy is the biggest line (about $343 million), but it is kept out of this count: most of it is operational (SAP/GRP systems, landfill, georeferencing), not superfluous. We’d rather not inflate the figure.

The evidence

Fifteen contracts, one by one

The largest discretionary contracts of the period, verified in the data and linked to their record on the site. Advertising concentrates in a handful of suppliers; the merchandising (t-shirts, hats) continued even in 2023 and 2024, deep in the red.

DateItemSupplierSupplier / categoryAmount
20 set. 2018Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 13,8 M View contract →
07 mar. 2023Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 9 M View contract →
03 abr. 2020Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 7,8 M View contract →
24 set. 2020Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 7,4 M View contract →
20 dic. 2019Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 7,4 M View contract →
25 jun. 2019Asesoramiento publicitarioSIETEVEINTE S.R.L.Advertising & communications$ 6,9 M View contract →
18 nov. 2024Remeras de algodón (naranja)LANCER S AApparel & merchandising$ 5,8 M View contract →
14 jun. 2016Publicidad radialMONTE CARLO S AAdvertising & communications$ 4,2 M View contract →
27 jul. 2016Publicidad televisivaSAETA (Emisoras de Televisión y Anexos)Advertising & communications$ 3,8 M View contract →
13 dic. 2023Remeras de algodón (naranja)LANCER S AApparel & merchandising$ 3,8 M View contract →
08 may. 2019Venta de entradas para espectáculosAsociación Rural del UruguayEvents & shows$ 3,2 M View contract →
13 set. 2019Carpa para espectáculosCANCLINI VILAR FEDERICOEvents & shows$ 3,2 M View contract →
07 mar. 2019Campaña publicitariaAMEN S.A.Advertising & communications$ 2,7 M View contract →
06 mar. 2020Venta de entradas para espectáculosAsociación Rural del UruguayEvents & shows$ 2,7 M View contract →
16 dic. 2022Vallado para el desfile de Carnaval 2023PALLADIUM S AEvents & shows$ 2,6 M View contract →

Keep exploring

All of the city government’s contracts

This report is a snapshot of the discretionary part. To see the rest — public works, fuel, waste collection, health — open the agency detail or the explorer.

The cases that made the news

What had already surfaced in the press

Four expenses that reached public debate. They come from the cited press, not the procurement data; we add them as context.

These four figures come from the press, not from a file: they do not appear as a single identifiable contract in the open procurement data. (The city did buy refuse-compactor trucks, but in 2016 — not the 2024 purchase referenced.) We keep them as context, each linked to its article.

How it was done

Method and limits

Purchases come from the site’s data (Compras Estatales, buyer 98-1). One corrupt 2019 record (a quantity error reporting ~$182 billion) is excluded, and we lead with the median and capped totals. Every ledger contract was verified in the data and links to its file.

«Superfluous» is a judgement, not a fact. We flag as discretionary what a body in deficit can postpone — advertising, shows, catering, merchandising — and leave out operational consultancy. The reader opens each file and judges.

Do you know something about this?

Tell it where you can be protected

We publish what is in the open data. What isn't — the file, the message, what was said in the meeting — goes to Uruguay Leaks, the anonymous inbox run by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. The message is written for you: copy it, add what you know and paste it into their form.

Do not send it from your work computer or work email. Uruguay Leaks protects the submission, not the machine you send it from.

Uruguay Leaks is a project by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. We are not affiliated with them and receive no copy of what you send.

About this data

This is data journalism over open data, not an audit. Purchase amounts are what the State publishes; the deficit and media cases are what the cited press reported.

Flagging spending as «discretionary» or «superfluous» is an editorial reading in the context of the deficit, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Every contract links to its official source so anyone can check.