Skip to content
Con la tuya, contribuyenteEvery peso the Uruguayan state spends, traceable.
Sign in
Scope2.17 million records searchedPeriod2011 → 2026Information request · OCDS corpus · RUPE · Court of Accounts

Own investigation · two sources

The repair shops the public record cannot see

The Soriano departmental council measured spending on private repair shops and found a truck that entered the same shop 96 times. We looked for that spending in the state procurement record. Not one peso is there, and the reason is measurable.

Soriano departmental governmentKOF 013238 repair shopsZero awards
$ 207 M
to private repair shops
January 2021 to February 2026, per the information request
96
shop visits by KOF 0132
to the Zubiaurre shop, January 2021 to July 2026
38
repair shops hired
six take 65% of the spending
235
vehicles in the fleet
trucks, utility vehicles and others

The information request

What the departmental government answered

Councillor Diego Guevara asked for the detail of vehicle repair spending. The departmental government answered in writing, signed by acting intendant Raúl Bruno. The answer says that between January 2021 and February 2026 it paid $207 million to 38 private repair shops. That is about 5 million dollars.

Six shops take close to 65% of that figure. The largest is José Zubiaurre's shop, with $39,324,824. The same answer states it carried out 1,535 repairs of municipal vehicles between January 2021 and July 2026.

The Frente Amplio caucus, 11 councillors, voted to ask the Court of Accounts to audit how the departmental government hires repair shops and outside suppliers. The request needs one third of the council.

Repair shopBilled
José Zubiaurre$ 39,3 M
La Ruta$ 35 M
Electromecánica Barreto$ 19,1 M
Plácido Ruiz$ 18,6 M
Gonzalo González$ 12,6 M
Tornería Feller$ 12 M
The other 32 shops$ 70,4 M

The six amounts come from the information request. The line for the other 32 is a subtraction against the total, which was published rounded to $207 million: it is therefore approximate.

The vehicle

One shop visit every 21 days

UruguayKOF 0132

The Mercedes Benz truck with plate KOF 0132 entered the Zubiaurre shop 96 times between January 2021 and July 2026. That is 66 months. The average is one visit every 21 days.

The pace rises. In 2025 the truck went in 22 times. In the first seven months of 2026 it went in 12 times. The answer details three repeated repair types and does not cover the remaining visits.

It is not an isolated case. Seven other Foton trucks add between 62 and 86 repairs each over the same window. Intendant Guillermo Besozzi attributed the frequency of the KOF 0132 to the vehicle's age.

The three types come from the information request. The "not broken down" line is the subtraction against the 96 visits: the answer does not say what was repaired in the rest.

In a fleet of these dimensions there is permanently a certain number of units under service, preventive maintenance or repair.

Guillermo Besozzi, intendant of Soriano

Our measurement

The state procurement record sees not one peso

Awards published by the Soriano departmental government since 2021

0

out of its own 373 records on the state portal

The platform indexes 2.17 million records from the public procurement portal since 2002. The Soriano departmental government is in that corpus with 548 records since 2011. All of them are calls. None carries an award, so the normalised total is zero.

It publishes when it opens a call and does not publish when it awards. The $207 million on repair shops never entered the record for a second reason: in the whole series there is not one call for vehicle repair or mechanical shop services. That spending went through direct purchase, with no prior call.

There are calls to buy vehicles. We counted 12 since 2021, for brand-new trucks and pickups. In 2026 it called for four utility trucks, two ten-tonne tippers and one three-tonne tipper. With no published award we do not know how many of those purchases went through.

The comparison

Two of nineteen departmental governments publish zero

Records published since 2021 and how many carry an award. The bar measures that ratio, not spending.

Departmental governmentRecordsWith award
Montevideo101,48578,51477%
Canelones8,4744,52553%
Paysandú5,3191,60830%
Colonia3,7022,37064%
Florida2,6142,14982%
Durazno1,05614814%
San José93138641%
Treinta y Tres87231136%
Tacuarembó78929638%
Maldonado773608%
Río Negro62113922%
Rivera58318532%
Flores55522440%
Lavalleja51710%
Salto41617241%
Soriano37300%
Rocha36600%
Cerro Largo3123511%
Artigas26611844%

Soriano and Rocha publish zero awards. Lavalleja publishes one. The rest publish hundreds or thousands. The ratio does not say whether a departmental government spends well: it says whether its spending can be read.

Who they are

Three of the six appear in the supplier registry

The departmental government published no tax ID for any shop. We searched the six names in RUPE, the public registry of state suppliers.

Name in the information requestLegal name in RUPETax IDAddress
José ZubiaurreZUBIAURRE SASEN JOSE FERNANDO180285360013Ruta 14 km 3, Mercedes
Tornería FellerTORNERIA FELLER HERMANOS SAS220206750010Ruta 2 km 207.800, José E. Rodó
Plácido RuizRUIZ OLANO PLACIDO180290610014Gral. Artigas 1064, Dolores

The match is by name and department. RUPE does not publish a company's line of business, so this does not confirm they are the shops. All three are listed as active.

None of the three tax IDs has a single award in the 2.17 million records of the corpus. They sell to the departmental government, which is precisely the buyer that does not publish.

The Court of Accounts

It was already flagging the government's spending

34
The Court of Accounts
2018–2022
13
What cannot be said
It was already flagging the government's spending

Our copy of Court of Accounts rulings covers 2018 to 2022. In that window there are 34 rulings on the Soriano departmental government. Thirteen concern flagged spending or repeat spending over a flag, quarter by quarter.

The ruling does not say which spending was flagged. That detail lives only in the PDF of each file. It cannot be claimed that the Court flagged the payments to repair shops, and this page does not claim it.

What cannot be said

Thirteen rulings on flagged spending are not thirteen objections to the repair shops. They are thirteen quarters in which the delegate comptroller reported flagged spending by the departmental government, on any item.

Context

The intendant's criminal case is a separate file

Guillermo Besozzi was charged in March 2025 with several corruption offences and was under house arrest. He won the departmental election in May 2025 and took office for a fourth time.

In March 2026 prosecutor Luisa Vago requested dismissal for him and six senior officials, and the case was closed. That file does not include the repair shop spending.

On the audit the Frente Amplio is requesting, Besozzi said he considers it legitimate and that the administration is calm about eventual oversight.

Method

The limits of this piece

  • The amounts per shop, the 96 visits and the fleet size come from the information request. We did not measure them and cannot verify them against the public record, because they are not there.
  • The RUPE match is by name and department. Without the tax ID the departmental government bills each shop under, the identification is not confirmed.
  • Our copy of Court of Accounts rulings ends in 2022. A count from 2023 onward would give a different number.
  • The total for the other 32 shops is a subtraction against a rounded figure. It is good for scale, not for quoting.
  • None of this describes a proven irregularity. The discussion is about control and publicity of spending.

The four facts that would close the case

  • The tax ID the departmental government bills each shop under. It confirms or rules out the RUPE match.
  • The detail of each purchase order: what was repaired on each of the 96 visits and at what price.
  • The capacity of the municipal workshop, which the departmental government says it prioritises.
  • The ownership of the six repair shops.

None of the four is in open data today. The first three must come from the departmental government, or from the Court of Accounts audit if the council votes it.

Do you know something about this?

Tell it where you can be protected

We publish what is in the open data. What isn't — the file, the message, what was said in the meeting — goes to Uruguay Leaks, the anonymous inbox run by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. The message is written for you: copy it, add what you know and paste it into their form.

Do not send it from your work computer or work email. Uruguay Leaks protects the submission, not the machine you send it from.

Uruguay Leaks is a project by la diaria, PODER and DATA Uruguay. We are not affiliated with them and receive no copy of what you send.

How to read this investigation

This is an analysis of public procurement data, which is public record. It documents verifiable facts — amounts, dates, suppliers, procurement method — and flags patterns worth scrutiny, keeping proven facts apart from open questions.

An exception purchase, a high price or supplier concentration is not, on its own, proof of wrongdoing. Many contracts may have valid administrative justification. The goal is to enable citizen oversight, not to issue a verdict.

Companies and people are named only as state suppliers, as they appear in the official system. Anyone named may add their response or correct a figure, and it will be incorporated.